Occident Prone

Welcome to Australia’s wild West

Ironbar loses appeal

Posted by occidentprone on July 5, 2008

Ironbar Wilson Tuckey has lost his appeal – did he ever really have any?

Federal Member for O’Connor, Wilson Tuckey, has lost an appeal against a speeding fine he received last year.

Police caught Mr Tuckey driving at 121 kilometres an hour along a highway south east of Perth in September.

He disputed the radar reading, arguing his cruise control was set to the speed limit of 110 kilometres an hour.

However, Magistrate Elizabeth Hamilton found Mr Tuckey guilty and fined him $150 and ordered him to pay $110 in court costs. (Source: ABC)

For grizzleguts dinosaur – he’s the oldest MP at 72 –  the speeding is a minor infraction. He’s done much worse and is an MP despite having a criminal conviction for violent assault against an Aboriginal man while Ironbar was a Carnarvon pub owner in 1967. This year, he was the only MP to walk from Parliament while Kevin Rudd said sorry to the stolen generations.

He might appeal further, says PerthNow, after he “argued strenuously that speed guns can’t be trusted”.

Constable Leavesley told magistrate Liz Hamilton in Narrogin Court that Mr Tuckey became agitated and uneasy and told her he was a member of Parliament and that radars don’t work. 

“I was delayed in doing my job by what I thought was a false accusation,” Mr Tuckey said on Channel 7 news tonight. 

He said he was not trying to intimidate the officer or get out of being charged. 

Mr Tuckey, who represented himself, said his cruise control was set at 110 km/h and that the testing of the radar for accuracy was questionable. 

At one point magistrate Liz Hamilton told him he was in a court of law, and not in parliament making a speech. 

Outside court Mr Tuckey said: “The way the law is written gives a motorist less protection than a terrorist.” 

He was fined $150 with $110 costs. 

Mr Tuckey appeared at the same court 20 years ago when he fought and won a battle against an alleged speeding offence. 

(Incidentally, ABC said he was doing 121kph and PerthNow said 123kph.)

A motorist might have less protection than a terrorist, but who is protecting us from Ironbar?


5 Responses to “Ironbar loses appeal”

  1. Rolly said

    Aahh! The grand old man of spurious argument.

    That he continues to be elected speaks volumes for the red-necked mindlessness of his constituents.

  2. occidentprone said

    That was the obvious question – what sort of ninnies are Labor putting against him that he can’t be ousted and what sort of power does he have that preselectors can’t see what a liability he is. Even John Howard was loathe to sack him from the ministry after Tuckey wrote to the powers that be in South Australia on behalf of an errant son.

  3. Rolly said

    Like most things in this corrupt world of ours, there is probably a raft of ‘hidden agendas’ to which the average ‘mug punter’ is not, will not be, and never was, privy.

  4. Rolly said

    Referring to the heading of this posting “Ironbar loses appeal”, is that more wishful than realistic in terms of the electorate?
    I must admit that he never really appealed to me 😀

  5. occidentprone said

    Realistically, death might be the only thing that defeats the old bastard. Even senility is no safe bet to peg him back because how could you tell?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: